[TRA-93] initialize vault module params in v5.0.0 upgrade handler #1359
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates aim to enhance the integration and functionality of the vault module within the protocol. These changes include incorporating the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- protocol/app/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade_container_test.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/x/vault/types/types.go (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (4)
protocol/x/vault/types/types.go (1)
Pattern
**/**: Do not include a walkthrough. For all comments on line changes that are longer than 15 lines, add a prefix to the comment of what lines you are commenting on (for example: "The changes from lines 100 to 200...". Add your comment to be on the last 15 lines of the chunk rather than adding your comment to the entire chunk.protocol/app/upgrades.go (1)
Pattern
**/**: Do not include a walkthrough. For all comments on line changes that are longer than 15 lines, add a prefix to the comment of what lines you are commenting on (for example: "The changes from lines 100 to 200...". Add your comment to be on the last 15 lines of the chunk rather than adding your comment to the entire chunk.protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade_container_test.go (1)
Pattern
**/**: Do not include a walkthrough. For all comments on line changes that are longer than 15 lines, add a prefix to the comment of what lines you are commenting on (for example: "The changes from lines 100 to 200...". Add your comment to be on the last 15 lines of the chunk rather than adding your comment to the entire chunk.protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade.go (1)
Pattern
**/**: Do not include a walkthrough. For all comments on line changes that are longer than 15 lines, add a prefix to the comment of what lines you are commenting on (for example: "The changes from lines 100 to 200...". Add your comment to be on the last 15 lines of the chunk rather than adding your comment to the entire chunk.
Additional comments not posted (4)
protocol/x/vault/types/types.go (1)
27-34: The addition ofGetParamsandSetParamsmethods to theVaultKeeperinterface is well-implemented. These methods are essential for managing vault module parameters, ensuring that the module can retrieve and update its configuration as needed. The method signatures are clear and follow Go's conventions, contributing to the maintainability and readability of the code.protocol/app/upgrades.go (1)
37-37: The addition ofapp.VaultKeeperto the parameters of theCreateUpgradeHandlerfunction withinsetupUpgradeHandlersis correctly implemented. This change enables the upgrade handler to interact with the vault module, which is crucial for initializing vault module parameters during the upgrade process. The code change is consistent with the established pattern of passing module keepers to upgrade handlers, enhancing the modularity and maintainability of the upgrade logic.protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade_container_test.go (1)
256-270: The implementation of thepostUpgradeCheckVaultParamsfunction in the container test is well-done. It correctly queries the vault parameters and asserts that they match the expected default parameters. This test is essential for verifying the successful initialization of vault module parameters after the upgrade, ensuring the module's proper functionality. The use ofrequire.NoErrorfor error handling andassert.Equalfor asserting the equality of parameters is appropriate and follows best practices for writing effective tests.protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade.go (1)
304-315: TheinitializeVaultModuleParamsfunction is correctly implemented to set the vault module parameters to their default values usingvaulttypes.DefaultParams(). This step is crucial for ensuring the vault module's proper functionality post-upgrade. The function's error handling, which usespanicto halt the upgrade process in case of a failure to set parameters, is appropriate given the critical nature of this operation in the upgrade context. This implementation ensures that the module parameters are correctly initialized, contributing to the system's overall integrity and functionality post-upgrade.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- protocol/app/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade_container_test.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/x/vault/types/types.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- protocol/app/upgrades.go
- protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade.go
- protocol/app/upgrades/v5.0.0/upgrade_container_test.go
- protocol/x/vault/types/types.go
|
@Mergifyio backport release/protocol/v5.x |
✅ Backports have been created
|
(cherry picked from commit 19065b8)
Changelist
initialize vault module params in v5.0.0 upgrade handler
Test Plan
container test
Author/Reviewer Checklist
state-breakinglabel.indexer-postgres-breakinglabel.PrepareProposalorProcessProposal, manually add the labelproposal-breaking.feature:[feature-name].backport/[branch-name].refactor,chore,bug.Summary by CodeRabbit