First proposal to add EML coverage #191
Conversation
Multiple titles may be provided to indicate alternate titles for the resource.
but not an official namespace
But maybe linked under $creator term?
or maybe the significance is more related to $OtherEntityType/$attributeList ?
|
maybe need to look more into details to https://eml.ecoinformatics.org/spatialReference-2.2.0 for all ISOSpatialRepresentationType terms ? |
|
Thanks @yvanlebras this part of metadata mapping is not well maintained, unless it was experimental and working well. You may have a look tho the test case i did at https://github.com/eblondel/geometa/blob/master/tests/testthat/test_geometa_mapping.R Feel free to add on this test, or add extra unit tests to makes sure the suggested mapping improvements work well |
|
@yvanlebras i've merged your PR, but feel free to add more in the EML mapping. You might also be interested to look into the geoflow action to produce EML: https://github.com/r-geoflow/geoflow/blob/master/inst/actions/eml_create_eml.R This work was sponsored by the French Zones Ateliers at that time; together with the dataone action https://github.com/r-geoflow/geoflow/blob/master/inst/actions/dataone_upload_datapackage.R to publish EML and associated datasets |
Multiple titles may be provided to indicate alternate titles for the resource.