You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Even though we don't index the _id field explicitly, we can support prefix style query/filter on it (in a similar manner that we support term(s) query/filter on it - though there is also an explicit ids query).
There isn't really a need to add an ids_prefix style query/filter, since we can provide the same functionality automatically with prefix (again, in a similar manner that ids query/filter is no longer really needed).
The prefix query/filter will automatically work only against the specific type(s) if searching against the type (defined in the search request), or the field is prefixed by it (my_type._id as the prefix field name).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Even though we don't index the
_id
field explicitly, we can support prefix style query/filter on it (in a similar manner that we support term(s) query/filter on it - though there is also an explicitids
query).There isn't really a need to add an
ids_prefix
style query/filter, since we can provide the same functionality automatically withprefix
(again, in a similar manner thatids
query/filter is no longer really needed).The
prefix
query/filter will automatically work only against the specific type(s) if searching against the type (defined in the search request), or the field is prefixed by it (my_type._id
as the prefix field name).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: