NamedWritable keys must be strings, not dynamic #99408
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When developing the GenericNamedWriteable instances we were dynamically generating the key names from the class names, but it is better to use strings so that class name refactoring does not change the keys causing compatibility issues in inter-node communication in mixed clusters.
craigtaverner
added
>non-issue
:Analytics/Geo
|
Pinging @elastic/es-analytics-geo (Team:Analytics) |
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When developing the GenericNamedWriteable instances we were dynamically generating the key names from the class names, but it is better to use strings so that class name refactoring does not change the keys causing compatibility issues in inter-node communication in mixed clusters.