Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "[Fleet] use @kbn/config-schema in Fleet API (Part 1) (#192447)" #192840

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

juliaElastic
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit 1116ac6.

Related to #184685

There were a few issues reported by the security team (like #192832)
It seems we have gaps in the test coverage, and adding the response schemas to the code is impacting the API as it adds validation on the response objects.
I'll reopen the pr with adding more test coverage to prevent other errors.

@juliaElastic juliaElastic added the release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes label Sep 13, 2024
@juliaElastic juliaElastic self-assigned this Sep 13, 2024
@juliaElastic juliaElastic requested a review from a team as a code owner September 13, 2024 10:39
@botelastic botelastic bot added the Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team label Sep 13, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/fleet (Team:Fleet)

@obltmachine
Copy link

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • /oblt-deploy : Deploy a Kibana instance using the Observability test environments.
  • run docs-build : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@juliaElastic juliaElastic enabled auto-merge (squash) September 13, 2024 12:24
@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Test Failures

  • [job] [logs] Fleet Cypress Tests #4 / View agents list Agent status filter should filter on healthy (16 result)

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

cc @juliaElastic

@juliaElastic juliaElastic merged commit 3cc99fc into elastic:main Sep 13, 2024
27 checks passed
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added v9.0.0 backport:skip This commit does not require backporting labels Sep 13, 2024
juliaElastic added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
markov00 pushed a commit to markov00/kibana that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
…#192447)" (elastic#192840)

This reverts commit 1116ac6.

Related to elastic#184685

There were a few issues reported by the security team (like
elastic#192832)
It seems we have gaps in the test coverage, and adding the response
schemas to the code is impacting the API as it adds validation on the
response objects.
I'll reopen the pr with adding more test coverage to prevent other
errors.
@jbudz
Copy link
Member

jbudz commented Sep 20, 2024

@juliaElastic this pull request has an 8.16.0 label and a backport:skip label. Can you please apply a backport or drop the version label? Replacing backport:skip with backport:version will allow automation to run.

@juliaElastic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@juliaElastic this pull request has an 8.16.0 label and a backport:skip label. Can you please apply a backport or drop the version label? Replacing backport:skip with backport:version will allow automation to run.

This was already backported to 8.x branch here #192904

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants