build: add API_NO_BOOST* annotations. #9480
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These allow specific types, expressions and files to be excluded from API boosting via annotation. API_NO_BOOST_FILE (anywhere in the file) will skip boosting of the file, API_NO_BOOST() wrapped around an expression or type will bypass boosting of that text. The idea is that there are some types that we do not ever want to upgrade as they are relevant to the cross-version wire impedance matching, or testing v2 compat when the tree is v3alpha. The sites identified in this PR were taken from my WiP in which I have the entire tree boosted and tests passing. It's possible we might need to tune some more later, but this should go a reasonable way towards reducing the amount of manual fixups required after boosting to get tests passing again. Risk level: Low (macros are nops) Testing: bazel test //test/..., new api_booster golden tests. Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
lizan
reviewed
Dec 26, 2019
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com>
lizan
approved these changes
Dec 26, 2019
prakhag1
pushed a commit
to prakhag1/envoy
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2020
These allow specific types, expressions and files to be excluded from API boosting via annotation. API_NO_BOOST_FILE (anywhere in the file) will skip boosting of the file, API_NO_BOOST() wrapped around an expression or type will bypass boosting of that text. The idea is that there are some types that we do not ever want to upgrade as they are relevant to the cross-version wire impedance matching, or testing v2 compat when the tree is v3alpha. The sites identified in this PR were taken from my WiP in which I have the entire tree boosted and tests passing. It's possible we might need to tune some more later, but this should go a reasonable way towards reducing the amount of manual fixups required after boosting to get tests passing again. Risk level: Low (macros are nops) Testing: bazel test //test/..., new api_booster golden tests. Part of envoyproxy#8082 Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch <htuch@google.com> Signed-off-by: Prakhar <prakhar_au@yahoo.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These allow specific types, expressions and files to be excluded from
API boosting via annotation. API_NO_BOOST_FILE (anywhere in the file)
will skip boosting of the file, API_NO_BOOST() wrapped around an
expression or type will bypass boosting of that text.
The idea is that there are some types that we do not ever want to
upgrade as they are relevant to the cross-version wire impedance
matching, or testing v2 compat when the tree is v3alpha.
The sites identified in this PR were taken from my WiP in which I have
the entire tree boosted and tests passing. It's possible we might need
to tune some more later, but this should go a reasonable way towards
reducing the amount of manual fixups required after boosting to get
tests passing again.
Risk level: Low (macros are nops)
Testing: bazel test //test/..., new api_booster golden tests.
Part of #8082
Signed-off-by: Harvey Tuch htuch@google.com