Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

High degrees of freedom with individual satnum/eqlnum #139

Closed
wouterjdb opened this issue Aug 24, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #160
Closed

High degrees of freedom with individual satnum/eqlnum #139

wouterjdb opened this issue Aug 24, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #160
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@wouterjdb
Copy link
Contributor

When simulating Norne, there are clearly different equilibration regions. Also tuning the relative permeability individually will be beneficial for a well-by-well match. However, when options are set to individual, without adding a single additional node, the degrees of freedom end up at nearly 30,000, which is about 4 times the number of 'observations'.

We should consider limiting the number of equilibration/relative permeability regions to have the right amount of flexibility. A simple first step could be to take the original simulation regions and assign the same regions number in the same locations.

This would in essence not violate the data-driven principle of FlowNet as we could assign regions based on well properties. But before answering that question, testing the principle based on simulation model output could be useful.

@wouterjdb wouterjdb added help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested labels Aug 24, 2020
@olelod
Copy link
Collaborator

olelod commented Sep 4, 2020

In theory flow tubes can be completely outside of the original simulation grid. Any thoughts on what to assign then? Find the closest tube which has allready been assigned to a region and use that one? Other suggestions?

@wouterjdb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, the nearest region. But nearest tube is (nearly) the same.

@olelod
Copy link
Collaborator

olelod commented Sep 6, 2020

Slowly getting there
norne_ecl
flownet

@olelod
Copy link
Collaborator

olelod commented Sep 8, 2020

For EQLNUM i clearly see the need for being able to define values for individual regions in the config yaml. Do we want the same for SATNUM? Is it enough to be able to change parameters per region, starting out with the same values?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants