Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use source model EQLNUM region when generating a FlowNet #160

Merged
merged 84 commits into from
Sep 14, 2020

Conversation

olelod
Copy link
Collaborator

@olelod olelod commented Sep 1, 2020

There are a lot of parameters to history match when we use individual SATNUM/EQLNUM. To limit this number we can use the original models' SATNUM/EQLNUM.


Contributor checklist

  • 🎉 This PR closes High degrees of freedom with individual satnum/eqlnum #139.
  • 📜 I have broken down my PR into the following tasks:
    • Assign eqlnum regions from simulation to FlowNet model.
    • Assign satnum regions from simulation to FlowNet model
    • Testing
  • 🤖 I have added tests, or extended existing tests, to cover any new features or bugs fixed in this PR.
  • 📖 I have considered adding a new entry in CHANGELOG.md.
  • 📚 I have considered updating the documentation.

.github/workflows/flownet.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/flownet/ahm/_run_ahm.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/flownet/ahm/_run_ahm.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/flownet/data/from_flow.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@wouterjdb wouterjdb marked this pull request as ready for review September 14, 2020 10:42
@anders-kiaer anders-kiaer changed the title I139 eqlnum satnum regions EQLNUM and SATNUM regions Sep 14, 2020
@wouterjdb wouterjdb changed the title EQLNUM and SATNUM regions Use source model EQLNUM region when generating a FlowNet Sep 14, 2020
@wouterjdb wouterjdb self-requested a review September 14, 2020 15:11
Copy link
Contributor

@wouterjdb wouterjdb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

@anders-kiaer anders-kiaer merged commit 88e6b6c into master Sep 14, 2020
@anders-kiaer anders-kiaer deleted the i139-eqlnum-satnum-regions branch September 14, 2020 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

High degrees of freedom with individual satnum/eqlnum
3 participants