Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary if in batch handling #68

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2017

Conversation

heyitsanthony
Copy link
Contributor

This is safe, as the only place that creates call values always
explicitly sets err. It's a leftover from an earlier iteration of the
code.

(merged into boltdb, see boltdb/bolt@32cc6eb)

This is safe, as the only place that creates call values always
explicitly sets err. It's a leftover from an earlier iteration of the
code.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@32c383e). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #68   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   85.46%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        9           
  Lines             ?     1858           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     1588           
  Misses            ?      160           
  Partials          ?      110
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
db.go 82.79% <100%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 32c383e...bcfcdab. Read the comment docs.

@xiang90
Copy link
Contributor

xiang90 commented Nov 26, 2017

Lgtm

@xiang90 xiang90 merged commit b436469 into etcd-io:master Nov 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants