Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add explicit checks for assumptions in robustness test validation #17759

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

serathius
Copy link
Member

@serathius serathius commented Apr 9, 2024

cc @MadhavJivrajani @ahrtr @siyuanfoundation

Started using #17733 and imminently make a mistake of copying one report over another. This results in strange errors and linearization visualization. It took me more time than I want to admit to identify the problem.

Adding validation of assumptions that should always be true if report comes directly from robustness test run. This should re-evaluation of reports more user friendly by providing clear errors.

@serathius serathius force-pushed the robustness-assumptions branch 4 times, most recently from a2ecd1b to 93f9cb2 Compare April 9, 2024 17:40
@serathius
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@fuweid fuweid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

tests/robustness/validate/validate.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/robustness/validate/validate.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/robustness/validate/validate.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@serathius serathius force-pushed the robustness-assumptions branch 4 times, most recently from 3c071e4 to f54fbc8 Compare April 12, 2024 12:12
Signed-off-by: Marek Siarkowicz <siarkowicz@google.com>
@serathius serathius merged commit 2e6eebe into etcd-io:main Apr 12, 2024
44 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants