-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix incorrect issue filter in user dashboard #23630
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5343ec1
fix
yp05327 085a44e
fix ui
yp05327 da6e7f8
fix unit test
yp05327 0d7eecd
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard
yp05327 448d141
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard
yp05327 862c853
fix sql error
yp05327 99458cb
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard
yp05327 97b4490
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard
yp05327 331a4e8
fix broken changes
yp05327 71b4011
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard
yp05327 b3e982f
improve
yp05327 1582bb1
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard
yp05327 33ba5c9
Update models/issues/issue_list.go
silverwind 6415db9
Merge branch 'main' into fix-issues-in-user-dashboard
yp05327 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -475,21 +475,6 @@ func buildIssueOverview(ctx *context.Context, unitType unit.Type) { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
switch filterMode { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't know whether we need to remove |
||
case issues_model.FilterModeAll: | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeYourRepositories: | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeAssign: | ||
opts.AssigneeID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeCreate: | ||
opts.PosterID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeMention: | ||
opts.MentionedID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeReviewRequested: | ||
opts.ReviewRequestedID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeReviewed: | ||
opts.ReviewedID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
} | ||
|
||
// keyword holds the search term entered into the search field. | ||
keyword := strings.Trim(ctx.FormString("q"), " ") | ||
ctx.Data["Keyword"] = keyword | ||
|
@@ -506,6 +491,23 @@ func buildIssueOverview(ctx *context.Context, unitType unit.Type) { | |
return | ||
} | ||
|
||
// In order to display all issues count in repo filter, | ||
// we need to check filterMode after CountIssuesByRepo | ||
switch filterMode { | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeAll: | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeYourRepositories: | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeAssign: | ||
opts.AssigneeID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeCreate: | ||
opts.PosterID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeMention: | ||
opts.MentionedID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeReviewRequested: | ||
opts.ReviewRequestedID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
case issues_model.FilterModeReviewed: | ||
opts.ReviewedID = ctx.Doer.ID | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Make sure page number is at least 1. Will be posted to ctx.Data. | ||
page := ctx.FormInt("page") | ||
if page <= 1 { | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the difference between these functions and the ones in
repo_model
? Maybe outline in a comment the differences?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The functions in
repo_model
are only used here (but will cause the issue). So we can remove them or move these new functions intorepo_model
. I didn't do that because I'm not sure whether the functions inrepo_model
are only designed forissuePullAccessibleRepoCond
.The difference is that the functions in
repo_model
useissue.repo_id in repo_ids
to filter the issue, so all issues in these repos will be caught.So we need use
issue.id in issue_ids
to get the correct issues.