Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhance(pipeline): add ruledata flags for vela validate pipeline #547

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

ecrupper
Copy link
Contributor

@ecrupper ecrupper commented Apr 8, 2024

This will allow users to run the validate command with an eye to visualizing how their pipelines compile based on certain contexts.

Follow up from go-vela/server#1076

@ecrupper ecrupper requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2024 18:30
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.65%. Comparing base (63d5835) to head (09e4396).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #547      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.53%   81.65%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         147      147              
  Lines        3568     3603      +35     
==========================================
+ Hits         2909     2942      +33     
- Misses        484      485       +1     
- Partials      175      176       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
command/pipeline/exec.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
command/pipeline/validate.go 71.42% <100.00%> (+5.71%) ⬆️
action/pipeline/validate.go 87.82% <87.87%> (+1.61%) ⬆️

@ecrupper ecrupper merged commit c24173e into main Apr 8, 2024
15 of 17 checks passed
@ecrupper ecrupper deleted the enhance/validate/ruledata branch April 8, 2024 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants