Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Avoid using packages.Load #420

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 19, 2020
Merged

Avoid using packages.Load #420

merged 3 commits into from
May 19, 2020

Conversation

linzhp
Copy link
Contributor

@linzhp linzhp commented Mar 26, 2020

Description
Partially fixing #419

It turn out there are two places calling go list:

This PR avoids calling packages.Load and saves one of the go list calls. Some performance data:

With 0b87a54:

$ go clean --cache --modcache && time go run ./mockgen -source /Users/zplin/gocode/src/github.com/bazelbuild/bazel-gazelle/language/lang.go > /dev/null
go: downloading golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190425150028-36563e24a262
go: extracting golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190425150028-36563e24a262
go: finding golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190425150028-36563e24a262
go run ./mockgen -source  > /dev/null  6.98s user 6.10s system 121% cpu 10.767 total

After this PR:

$ go clean --cache --modcache && time go run ./mockgen -source /Users/zplin/gocode/src/github.com/bazelbuild/bazel-gazelle/language/lang.go > /dev/null
go: downloading golang.org/x/mod v0.2.0
go: extracting golang.org/x/mod v0.2.0
go: downloading golang.org/x/xerrors v0.0.0-20191011141410-1b5146add898
go: extracting golang.org/x/xerrors v0.0.0-20191011141410-1b5146add898
go: finding golang.org/x/mod v0.2.0
go: finding golang.org/x/xerrors v0.0.0-20191011141410-1b5146add898
go run ./mockgen -source  > /dev/null  3.77s user 3.81s system 118% cpu 6.383 total

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

  • Includes tests

Reviewer Notes

  • The code flow looks good.
  • Tests added.

@linzhp
Copy link
Contributor Author

linzhp commented Mar 27, 2020

@codyoss I will add tests if the overall approach looks good to you

@codyoss
Copy link
Member

codyoss commented Mar 27, 2020

Thanks for the PR, I probably won't have time to look at this today, but will try to get to it tomorrow. Thanks for being an active member in the community 😄

@linzhp
Copy link
Contributor Author

linzhp commented Mar 27, 2020

The travis-ci is failing even all tests are passing.

@codyoss
Copy link
Member

codyoss commented Mar 27, 2020

6.19s$ ./ci/check_go_generate.sh
prog.go:14:2: use of internal package github.com/golang/mock/mockgen/internal/tests/internal_pkg/subdir/internal/pkg not allowed

mockgen/parse.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
return "", err
moduleMode := os.Getenv("GO111MODULE")
// trying to find the module
if moduleMode != "off" {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is auto a special case?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be worth being explicit /w a switch

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the meaning of auto changes from Go release to release. To be safe, I only skip checking go.mod when the mode is "off". This may result in different behavior than "go list" in older Go releases.

For example, when "GO111MODULE" is "auto", if a directory is under GOPATH, but also has a go.mod file, "go list" will use GOPATH in 1.12, and use Go module in 1.13. This PR is similar to the behavior of 1.13.

@codyoss
Copy link
Member

codyoss commented Mar 28, 2020

Overall, I think this seems good as long as we can test this throughly. Maybe we can/should also set different CI versions /w different GO111MODULE modes to help facilitate testing...

@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

1 similar comment
@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

1 similar comment
@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@codyoss
Copy link
Member

codyoss commented Apr 8, 2020

Could you please re-pull master. I will get back to this review this week, sorry for the delay.

@linzhp
Copy link
Contributor Author

linzhp commented Apr 20, 2020

@codyoss any progress?

@codyoss
Copy link
Member

codyoss commented Apr 20, 2020

Sorry, was waiting for the CI to go green, but it appears to have gotten stuck. I will get to this today or tomorrow.

@codyoss
Copy link
Member

codyoss commented Apr 24, 2020

It looks like there are failures with go generate: https://travis-ci.org/github/golang/mock/jobs/672731180

fixed linting issues

Add tests

unexport error

making it Windows compatible

merge from upstream
@linzhp
Copy link
Contributor Author

linzhp commented Apr 24, 2020

@codyoss fixed CI errors

@xtonyjiang
Copy link

It's too bad that in order to get this performance boost we have to not use go/packages, since I assume go/packages is supposed to allow us to not have to do all this branching logic based on whether we're using modules or not or what Go version we're using.

In the ideal world we would be able to take advantage of some go/packages-like thing that abstracts away the underlying import resolution system, without having the overhead of go list.

So I suppose we've accepted that we'll sacrifice possibly having to maintain this code path with future Go versions in order to get this speed boost? (Although maybe there won't be much more future maintenance because everything is stable now? Not sure what the Go roadmap looks like here.)

@linzhp
Copy link
Contributor Author

linzhp commented Apr 27, 2020

Yeah, Go's dependency manager is so tightly coupled with go build, making it very hard to reuse the dependency resolution logic if we use a different build system like Bazel.

Under Bazel's action environment, we don't have access to either GOCACHE or mod cache in the host machine. Every mockgen action runs from cold cache, similar to right after go clean --cache --modcache. Unfortunately, go list downloads and partially compiles the packages and dependencies. With cold cache, this is slow. The downloads and compilation are not necessary to find out the package path from a source directory. A lot of computation and I/O is wasted.

Yes, there is a trade-off between performance and future maintenance. Since Bazel suffers from this issue the more than go build, I can potentially implement the logic in a package driver and set GOPACKAGESDRIVER in bazel's gomock rule so packages.Load will not call goListDriver.

I thought implementing it in golang/mock would benefit more people. That's why I sent PR here first.

@linzhp
Copy link
Contributor Author

linzhp commented May 4, 2020

@codyoss weekly ping...

@linzhp
Copy link
Contributor Author

linzhp commented May 11, 2020

@codyoss weekly ping...

Copy link
Member

@codyoss codyoss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry this took so long to get back to.

mockgen/testdata/gomod/go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codyoss codyoss merged commit 92f53b0 into golang:master May 19, 2020
@codyoss
Copy link
Member

codyoss commented May 19, 2020

@linzhp Thank you for your contribution! 🎆

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants