Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check oncall rolling_users shift does not include empty group #1685

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

matiasb
Copy link
Contributor

@matiasb matiasb commented Jul 15, 2024

Related to grafana/oncall#4603

Copy link

In order to lower resource usage and have a faster runtime, PRs will not run Cloud tests automatically.
To do so, a Grafana Labs employee must trigger the cloud acceptance tests workflow manually.

@matiasb matiasb force-pushed the oncall-shift-empty-rolling-group branch 2 times, most recently from 9b81cda to 1640076 Compare July 15, 2024 19:03
@matiasb matiasb marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2024 19:14
@matiasb matiasb requested review from a team as code owners July 15, 2024 19:14
@@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ func TestAccOnCallOnCallShift_basic(t *testing.T) {
resource.TestCheckResourceAttr("grafana_oncall_on_call_shift.test-acc-on_call_shift", "frequency", "hourly"),
),
},
{
Config: testAccOnCallOnCallShiftEmptyRollingUsers(scheduleName, shiftName),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we also have another test that does test the new error message?

@matiasb matiasb force-pushed the oncall-shift-empty-rolling-group branch from 01b3960 to ccce415 Compare July 15, 2024 21:02
@julienduchesne julienduchesne merged commit 9d29e94 into main Jul 16, 2024
27 checks passed
@julienduchesne julienduchesne deleted the oncall-shift-empty-rolling-group branch July 16, 2024 01:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants