Add e2e tests for hbar/token allowance

[natanasow]

Description:

There was a test but was commented on because the image with the fix wasn't ready. HBAR approval could be done only via hapi but we don't test hapi calls in acceptance tests, so no actions are needed.

PS: charts install fails due to removing pnpm from dockerfile, so it has to be added in packages/server as a dependency

Related issue(s):

Fixes #1681

Blocked by:

• HIP-584: Transfer on estimate gas results in error 400 hedera-mirror-node#6778

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (24b48c4) 77.48% compared to head (b27c7ac) 77.48%.

❗ Current head b27c7ac differs from pull request most recent head a27c5bd. Consider uploading reports for the commit a27c5bd to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1682   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.48%   77.48%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines        2323     2323           
  Branches      475      475           
=======================================
  Hits         1800     1800           
  Misses        379      379           
  Partials      144      144           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
packages/relay/src/lib/clients/cache/redisCache.ts	55.88% <0.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[AlfredoG87]

LGTM

[AlfredoG87]

@natanasow should we split this PR in 2? so we can move forward with the fix of #1672 ?

[natanasow]

@natanasow should we split this PR in 2? so we can move forward with the fix of #1672 ?

Yep, yesterday I found a bug in the latest mirror node image and this PR will be blocked for a while. Will open a separate PR only for #1672 fix 🚀.

[Nana-EC]

@natanasow you should rebase. I think Eric address the other items so it should just be the pnpm part

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[natanasow]

@natanasow you should rebase. I think Eric address the other items so it should just be the pnpm part

The pnpm had been already added in another PR I guess, so this PR could be closed because it doesn't change anything right now 😕 .