-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add canonical test scenarios to RecordFileParserPerformanceTest
#8855
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Steven Sheehy <steven.sheehy@swirldslabs.com>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8855 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 92.20% 92.19% -0.02%
Complexity 7598 7598
============================================
Files 925 925
Lines 30423 30430 +7
Branches 3704 3707 +3
============================================
+ Hits 28052 28054 +2
- Misses 1545 1549 +4
- Partials 826 827 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
RecordFileParserPerformanceTest
Signed-off-by: Steven Sheehy <steven.sheehy@swirldslabs.com>
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description:
RecordFileParserPerformanceTest
RecordFileBuilder
andRecordItemBuilder
RecordItemBuilder
syntheticContractResults
in tests by defaultRecordFileBuilder
intoRecordItemBuilder.Builder.build()
so timestamp, transactionID, sequenceNumber, etc get increased automaticallyRelated issue(s):
Fixes #8700
Notes for reviewer:
Checklist