Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bedrock Custom Models have a maximum training concurrency of 2 #37990

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

gdavison
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Bedrock Custom Models have a maximum training concurrency of 2, and this limit cannot adjusted. Serializes the acceptance tests.

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc PKG=bedrock TESTS='TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel'

--- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial (14500.35s)
    --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel (14500.35s)
        --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel/vpcConfig (78.05s)
        --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel/dataSourceBasic (7069.65s)
        --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel/basic (67.86s)
        --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel/disappears (68.86s)
        --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel/tags (54.00s)
        --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel/kmsKey (58.00s)
        --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel/validationDataConfig (63.64s)
        --- PASS: TestAccBedrock_serial/CustomModel/validationDataConfigWaitForCompletion (7040.27s)

@gdavison gdavison requested a review from a team as a code owner June 14, 2024 23:25
Copy link

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. service/bedrock Issues and PRs that pertain to the bedrock service. labels Jun 14, 2024
@terraform-aws-provider terraform-aws-provider bot added the prioritized Part of the maintainer teams immediate focus. To be addressed within the current quarter. label Jun 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ewbankkit ewbankkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀.

@gdavison gdavison merged commit 8b7cf75 into main Jun 17, 2024
60 checks passed
@gdavison gdavison deleted the b-serialize-bedrock-custom-model branch June 17, 2024 16:56
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.55.0 milestone Jun 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the prioritized Part of the maintainer teams immediate focus. To be addressed within the current quarter. label Jun 20, 2024
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v5.55.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
service/bedrock Issues and PRs that pertain to the bedrock service. size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants