-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 403
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HIP128: Feedback/editorial change #1052
Conversation
0128-energy-subnetwork.md
Outdated
@@ -95,15 +96,14 @@ We propose using one pool for buffering issued baseline rewards: | |||
|
|||
**Network growth pool** acts as a resource for growing the network using direct incentives to DER hosts. This pool will receive tokens from the baseline DER host rewards inversely proportional to the total Energy subnetwork DC burn as long as this is less than $100 000 USD. The proportion allocated to the pool is calculated by: | |||
|
|||
Network Growth Pool Proportion = 0.5 − min(0.5, 0.5 * Total Energy Subnetwork DC burn / 1e10) | |||
Network Growth Pool Proportion = 0.5 − min(0.5, 0.5 \* Total Energy Subnetwork DC burn / 1e10) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps we can do this in LaTeX to clean up the syntax.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
$\text{Network Growth Pool Proportion} = 0.5 - \min\left(0.5, 0.5 \times \frac{\text{Total Energy Subnetwork DC burn}}{1e10}\right)$
0128-energy-subnetwork.md
Outdated
|
||
Network Growth Pool Proportion = 0.5 − min(0.5, 0.5 * Total ENERGY Network DC burn / 1e10) | ||
Network Growth Pool Proportion = 0.5 − min(0.5, 0.5 \* Total ENERGY Subnetwork DC burn / 1e10) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be cleaner to use LaTeX formatting here.
Network Growth Pool Proportion = 0.5 − min(0.5, 0.5 \* Total ENERGY Subnetwork DC burn / 1e10) | |
$\text{Network Growth Pool Proportion} = 0.5 - \min\left(0.5, 0.5 \times \frac{\text{Total Energy Subnetwork DC burn}}{10000000000}\right)$ |
… clear in USD in denominator as linked to text paragraph above.
Updated description to match commits. Added one commit. See description 5. |
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <75+abhay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <75+abhay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <75+abhay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <75+abhay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <75+abhay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <75+abhay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <75+abhay@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <75+abhay@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR makes editorial changes:
1. Reduce emphasis on IoT network usage
Discussions showed that we might have overestimated the use of IoT network in the hip leading many to think that the IoT network will be used more than it is. This commit tones this down a bit by removing words like “substantial” and “significant”.
As of discussion:
https://discord.com/channels/404106811252408320/1257917899319017553/1259214601590014154
2. Standardize capitalization for ENERGY vs ENERGY Subnetwork
After discussion with community and HF we follow this capitalization of Energy/ENERGY:
As of discussion:
https://discord.com/channels/404106811252408320/1257917899319017553/1258734498686697503
and follow up discussion with HF
3. veENERGY Staking changed to veHNT Delegation
HNT is staked to receive veHNT and then delegated to the Energy subnetwork. ENERGY is not staked to veENERGY.
As of discussion:
https://discord.com/channels/404106811252408320/1257917899319017553/1257964116518109226
4. Formatting of table and linting
Linting and formatting fixed.
5. Clarify DER Host staking
changed to