Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update run clm no trainer.py and run mlm no trainer.py #18638

Conversation

zhoutang776
Copy link
Contributor

@zhoutang776 zhoutang776 commented Aug 15, 2022

What does this PR do?

Fixes issue in selecting no_decay parameters, we need to exclude "layer_norm.weight" not "LayerNorm.weight"

Fixes issue that resume_step will not be constructed properly when the user continues to train from a checkpoint with gradient_accumulation_steps != 1

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline,
    Pull Request section?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
    to it if that's the case.
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
    documentation guidelines, and
    here are tips on formatting docstrings.
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

Who can review?

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.

found an error in selecting `no_decay` parameters and some small modifications when the user continues to train from a checkpoint
1. change `no_decay` list
2. if use continue to train their model from provided checkpoint, the `resume_step` will not be initialized properly if `args.gradient_accumulation_steps != 1`
@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev
Copy link

HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev commented Aug 15, 2022

The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged.

@LysandreJik
Copy link
Member

cc @muellerzr, would you like to take a look at this while Sylvain is away?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants