Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make HUD offset more intuitive #8226

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2022
Merged

Conversation

MrD-RC
Copy link
Collaborator

@MrD-RC MrD-RC commented Jul 13, 2022

Updated HUD offset to be more intuitive. Positive values for osd_horizon_offset moves the HUD up. Negative values move the HUD down.

Works with iNavFlight/inav-configurator#1540

Release Notes

The operation of osd_horizon_offset has been reversed, to make it more intuitve. If you have a non-zero value for osd_horizon_offset it will need to be inverted. For example osd_horizon_offset = 1 would become osd_horizon_offset = -1. Positive values move the HUD up, and negative values move it down. Please update your diff if you use this parameter; either manually, or using this tool.

Updated HUD offset to be more intuitive. Positive values move the HUD up. Negative values move the HUD down.
@MrD-RC MrD-RC added the Release Notes Add this when a PR needs to be mentioned in the release notes label Jul 13, 2022
@MrD-RC MrD-RC added this to the 6.0 milestone Jul 13, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@JulioCesarMatias JulioCesarMatias left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, this makes better sense now! LGTM

@MrD-RC MrD-RC merged commit efc3a11 into master Jul 14, 2022
@MrD-RC MrD-RC deleted the MrD_Make-move-AHI-more-intuitive branch July 14, 2022 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Release Notes Add this when a PR needs to be mentioned in the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants