Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alllow set verify parameter for boto3 #486

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Smosker
Copy link

@Smosker Smosker commented Apr 18, 2018

Boto3 has parameter verify but currently django-storages doesn't allow to set it.
http://boto3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/core/session.html#boto3.session.Session.client
I implement such feature because i need to set path to my internal certificate in order to work with internal s3 endpoint.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 18, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #486 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #486      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage    76.1%   76.12%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1578     1579       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1201     1202       +1     
  Misses        377      377
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
storages/backends/s3boto3.py 86.62% <100%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9f07eab...86016b2. Read the comment docs.

@sww314 sww314 added the s3boto label Jul 11, 2018
@jschneier
Copy link
Owner

Hello can you rebase, then I will merge.

@Smosker
Copy link
Author

Smosker commented Aug 31, 2018

done

@jschneier
Copy link
Owner

I meant rebasing but no worries I have merged this commit in #580. Thanks for opening the issue and providing the fix.

@jschneier jschneier closed this Sep 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants