Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Singleuserapp and 1.0 #143

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jun 18, 2019
Merged

Conversation

rkdarst
Copy link
Contributor

@rkdarst rkdarst commented Jun 13, 2019

Combines different things which have to go together to make it all work:

This at least minimally works for me in my test environment against current JH master!

jupyterhub/wrapspawner#27 has to be accepted too, or else it won't work out of the box with wrapspawner. maybe it will work here.

cmd-ntrf and others added 9 commits March 28, 2019 12:06
Instead of creating a batchspawner notebook app, batchspawner-singleuser
is now a wrapper that finds a port and add the port number to the
command-line argument of the singleuser app. This allows the usage
of batchspawner with jupyterlab for example.
- jupyterhub#139 changes port handling, this makes tests pass.
- Sets attribute mock_port, which gets used during the port polling phase.
…apper

- This fixes up tests for jupyterhub#141, which adds batchspawner-singleuser
  which changes regular expressions that need to be matched in the
  batch scripts.
@rkdarst
Copy link
Contributor Author

rkdarst commented Jun 14, 2019

green green green!

Includes test fixing from #139 and #141. Doesn't need wrapspawner fixes to make these tests pass at least.

@mbmilligan
Copy link
Member

Great, thanks for pulling these together. Looks good.

@mbmilligan mbmilligan merged commit a6d2fe6 into jupyterhub:master Jun 18, 2019
mbmilligan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2019
@rkdarst rkdarst deleted the singleuserapp_and_1.0 branch September 6, 2019 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants