🐛 Address targets falling out of sync after label selection changes

[ibolton336]

Resolves: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTA-3180

• Currently, the set-options screen allows edit of target labels which can be set manually on the Advanced options step or by way of selecting a target card on the target card step. This PR brings the form labels and selectedTarget form values in sync by updating the selected targets to reflect any form label changes in the set options page. This fixes the mta-3180 scenario by causing validation to reflect the now accurate state of the selectedTargets form value.

selectedtargetsfix.mov

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 13.79310% with 50 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 42.07%. Comparing base (b654645) to head (a2a142a).
Report is 195 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...rc/app/pages/applications/analysis-wizard/utils.ts	13.33%	39 Missing ⚠️
...pages/applications/analysis-wizard/set-options.tsx	9.09%	10 Missing ⚠️
...pages/applications/analysis-wizard/set-targets.tsx	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2019      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   39.20%   42.07%   +2.87%     
==========================================
  Files         146      171      +25     
  Lines        4857     5511     +654     
  Branches     1164     1313     +149     
==========================================
+ Hits         1904     2319     +415     
- Misses       2939     3176     +237     
- Partials       14       16       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
client	42.07% <13.79%> (+2.87%)	⬆️
server	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sjd78]

LGTM