Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(docs): updated readme wait condition #5371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2021

Conversation

NikeNano
Copy link
Member

@NikeNano NikeNano commented Mar 24, 2021

Description of your changes:
For kubeflow version 1.4 the env/platform-agnostic dont rely on kubernetes applications so suggest that we look at the pods instead for the wait condition.

Checklist:

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Mar 24, 2021
@NikeNano NikeNano changed the title fix(docs): updated readme with instructions for wait condition WIP fix(docs): updated readme with instructions for wait condition Mar 24, 2021
@NikeNano NikeNano closed this Mar 24, 2021
@NikeNano NikeNano reopened this Mar 24, 2021
@NikeNano NikeNano changed the title WIP fix(docs): updated readme with instructions for wait condition WIP fix(docs): updated readme wait condition Mar 24, 2021
@NikeNano NikeNano changed the title WIP fix(docs): updated readme wait condition fix(docs): updated readme wait condition Mar 26, 2021
@NikeNano
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @Bobgy

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ It's based on in-cluster PersistentVolumeClaim storage.
kubectl apply -k cluster-scoped-resources/
kubectl wait crd/applications.app.k8s.io --for condition=established --timeout=60s
kubectl apply -k env/platform-agnostic/
kubectl wait applications/pipeline -n kubeflow --for condition=Ready --timeout=1800s
kubectl wait pods -l application-crd-id=kubeflow-pipelines -n kubeflow --for condition=Ready --timeout=1800s
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for flagging this problem!
I think the change is reasonable for backward compatibility.

But we may need a better label selector, because the current one is related to application again.

@Bobgy
Copy link
Contributor

Bobgy commented Mar 26, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@google-oss-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Bobgy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Bobgy
Copy link
Contributor

Bobgy commented Mar 27, 2021

/lgtm

@google-oss-robot google-oss-robot merged commit a73a255 into kubeflow:master Mar 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants