Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't let find search filesystem mounts in docker build run step #10131

Merged

Conversation

tomodachi
Copy link
Contributor

@tomodachi tomodachi commented May 24, 2023

What type of PR is this?
kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
Fixes bug causing failure to build the ansible docker image with podman

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
#10130

Fixes #10130

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Don't let find search filesystem mounts in docker build run step 

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented May 24, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: tomodachi / name: Mateusz Mojsiejuk (be9f442)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from bozzo May 24, 2023 19:44
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @tomodachi!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kubespray 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kubespray has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from yankay May 24, 2023 19:44
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tomodachi. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 24, 2023
Dockerfile Outdated
@@ -38,4 +38,4 @@ RUN apt update -q \
&& echo $(curl -L https://dl.k8s.io/release/$KUBE_VERSION/bin/linux/$(dpkg --print-architecture)/kubectl.sha256) /usr/local/bin/kubectl | sha256sum --check \
&& chmod a+x /usr/local/bin/kubectl \
&& rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* /var/log/* \
&& find / -type d -name '*__pycache__' -prune -exec rm -rf {} \;
&& find / -mount -type d -name '*__pycache__' -prune -exec rm -rf {} \;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be sufficient to only look into the workdir and prevent the issue your are having IMO

Suggested change
&& find / -mount -type d -name '*__pycache__' -prune -exec rm -rf {} \;
&& find . -type d -name '*__pycache__' -prune -exec rm -rf {} \;

Copy link
Member

@MrFreezeex MrFreezeex May 25, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah wait no that's for pip dep and they are installed system wide... But actually there is already the no compile flag to pip so I guess we could simply remove this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@tomodachi tomodachi May 29, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's true that they shouldn't be created when pip is run with the no-compile flag

But examining this in a live docker container I realized that pycache files are created anyway.
They are created when the python3 python3-pip packages are installed.
So the find -prune is still useful as it will free up 17mb.

I've updated my PR to only search the /usr folder which is where the pycache files are located
Instead of searching the whole filesystem and ignoring mount points

Copy link
Member

@MrFreezeex MrFreezeex May 29, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the additional insight! Could you squash your commits? Apart from that lgtm.

@yankay
Copy link
Member

yankay commented May 25, 2023

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 25, 2023
Copy link
Member

@floryut floryut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tomodachi Thank you 👍

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, tomodachi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 31, 2023
@floryut floryut added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label May 31, 2023
@yankay
Copy link
Member

yankay commented Jun 5, 2023

HI @tomodachi

Would you please re-push the PR to trigger the CI again :-)
Thank you

@yankay yankay force-pushed the fix_podman_build_fail branch 2 times, most recently from 8b81b7d to 3ce4424 Compare June 6, 2023 03:03
Limit find cmd to /usr/ where __pycache__ files are located
@yankay
Copy link
Member

yankay commented Jun 6, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 18d84db into kubernetes-sigs:master Jun 6, 2023
yankay pushed a commit to yankay/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2023
…10131)

Limit find cmd to /usr/ where __pycache__ files are located
yankay pushed a commit to yankay/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2023
…10131)

Limit find cmd to /usr/ where __pycache__ files are located
k8s-ci-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2023
Limit find cmd to /usr/ where __pycache__ files are located

Co-authored-by: Mateusz Mojsiejuk <m@fishface.se>
palmeXx pushed a commit to palmeXx/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2023
…10131)

Limit find cmd to /usr/ where __pycache__ files are located
@tomodachi tomodachi deleted the fix_podman_build_fail branch June 12, 2023 10:19
maciej-markowski pushed a commit to maciej-markowski/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2023
…10131)

Limit find cmd to /usr/ where __pycache__ files are located
@yankay yankay mentioned this pull request Aug 24, 2023
@VannTen VannTen mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2024
pedro-peter pushed a commit to pedro-peter/kubespray that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
…10131)

Limit find cmd to /usr/ where __pycache__ files are located
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

podman build -t kubespray . fails with: find: ‘/proc/tty/driver’: Permission denied
5 participants