Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pull-secrets-store-csi-driver-e2e-gcp job failing #418

Closed
aramase opened this issue Jan 5, 2021 · 9 comments
Closed

pull-secrets-store-csi-driver-e2e-gcp job failing #418

aramase opened this issue Jan 5, 2021 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test.

Comments

@aramase
Copy link
Member

aramase commented Jan 5, 2021

This PR job has been failing for PRs

Some of the PRs:
#412
#413
#417

/kind failing-test
cc @tam7t

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. label Jan 5, 2021
@aramase
Copy link
Member Author

aramase commented Jan 5, 2021

/assign @tam7t

@tam7t
Copy link
Contributor

tam7t commented Jan 5, 2021

The gcp-secrets-store-cred from https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/c50d055243429b918a2539b4ad86f91dce550520/config/jobs/kubernetes-sigs/secrets-store-csi-driver/secrets-store-csi-driver-presets.yaml#L36 has expired.

I've generated a new one and waiting for test infra to be updated.

@tam7t
Copy link
Contributor

tam7t commented Jan 5, 2021

the new one will expire on 5 April, so I'll need to rotate before then again 😢

@aramase
Copy link
Member Author

aramase commented Jan 6, 2021

Looks like the new creds are ready for use: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C09QZ4DQB/p1609881564374600

Trying on a PR to confirm it's working.

@aramase
Copy link
Member Author

aramase commented Jan 6, 2021

Creds are fixed now. The tests are green again.

@tam7t I think we should have an issue to remind rotating the creds again on 5th April. We can open an issue here or the gcp provider. WDYT?

@tam7t
Copy link
Contributor

tam7t commented Jan 7, 2021

As discussed in the sig meeting today I'll reach out to #sig-testing to see if there's another auth mechanism that doesn't require manual rotation.

@aramase
Copy link
Member Author

aramase commented Feb 17, 2021

@tam7t What was the outcome of the discussion with #sig-testing? Should we close this issue now?

@tam7t
Copy link
Contributor

tam7t commented Mar 23, 2021

/close

We want a separate credential to isolate workloads. This will be on me/Google team to setup alerts to manually rotate for the time being.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tam7t: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close

We want a separate credential to isolate workloads. This will be on me/Google team to setup alerts to manually rotate for the time being.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants