Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dns benchmark failing after python 2->3 migration #1587

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2020

Conversation

mm4tt
Copy link
Contributor

@mm4tt mm4tt commented Nov 20, 2020

Ref. #1586

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 20, 2020
@mm4tt mm4tt force-pushed the dns_python3 branch 3 times, most recently from de4a58f to 39600c4 Compare November 20, 2020 11:41
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 20, 2020
@mm4tt mm4tt force-pushed the dns_python3 branch 5 times, most recently from f20ad7b to bfb8ddf Compare November 23, 2020 07:33
@mm4tt mm4tt changed the title WIP Fix dns benchmark failing after python 2->3 migration Nov 23, 2020
@@ -161,8 +162,6 @@ def _kubectl(self, stdin, *args):
"""
cmdline = [self.args.kubectl_exec] + list(args)
_log.debug('kubectl %s', cmdline)
if stdin:
_log.debug('kubectl stdin\n%s', add_prefix('in | ', stdin))
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed this logging as it was causing more harm than good. We're logging stdin here, which can be anything, e.g. a tar archive...

@mm4tt
Copy link
Contributor Author

mm4tt commented Nov 23, 2020

/assign @prameshj

@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

It seems the tests are passing now, which is great.

/hold
Waiting for Pavithra.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 23, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 23, 2020
@prameshj
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel
/lgtm

Thanks Matt!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 23, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mm4tt, prameshj, wojtek-t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit e3bd829 into kubernetes:master Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants