fix: Run "go mod vendor" and "go mod tidy"

[akrejcir]

What this PR does / why we need it:
Updated the vendor files.

Release note:

None

[codingben]

/lgtm

[lyarwood]

\n    <v1.VirtualMachineInstancePhase>: Pending\nto equal\n    <v1.VirtualMachineInstancePhase>: Running",
      }
      Assertion in callback at /go/src/github.com/kubevirt/vm-console-proxy/tests/proxy_test.go:312 failed:
      Expected
          <v1.VirtualMachineInstancePhase>: Pending
      to equal
          <v1.VirtualMachineInstancePhase>: Running
  In [BeforeEach] at: /go/src/github.com/kubevirt/vm-console-proxy/tests/proxy_test.go:313 @ 02/22/23 11:11:13.087
------------------------------
Summarizing 3 Failures:
  [FAIL] Token /vnc endpoint with VMI [BeforeEach] should fail if VMI does not exist
  /go/src/github.com/kubevirt/vm-console-proxy/tests/proxy_test.go:313
  [FAIL] Token /vnc endpoint with VMI [BeforeEach] should proxy VNC connection
  /go/src/github.com/kubevirt/vm-console-proxy/tests/proxy_test.go:313
  [FAIL] Token /vnc endpoint with VMI [BeforeEach] should fail if token is expired
  /go/src/github.com/kubevirt/vm-console-proxy/tests/proxy_test.go:313

vm-console-proxy/tests/proxy_test.go

Lines 309 to 313 in 0304c6e

	Eventually(func(g Gomega) {
	vmi, err := ApiClient.VirtualMachineInstance(vm.Namespace).Get(vm.Name, &metav1.GetOptions{})
	g.Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
	g.Expect(vmi.Status.Phase).To(Equal(kubevirtcorev1.Running))
	}, time.Minute, time.Second).Should(Succeed())

Smells like we need a longer timeout than the current 60 seconds?

[akrejcir]

Yes, I've increased the timeout in the latest revision.

[akrejcir]

/retest

[akrejcir]

There is a problem with kubevirt on OCP 4.13. It cannot start a VM.
That is not related to this PR.

/override ci/prow/e2e-functests

[kubevirt-bot]

@akrejcir: Overrode contexts on behalf of akrejcir: ci/prow/e2e-functests

In response to this:

There is a problem with kubevirt on OCP 4.13. It cannot start a VM.
That is not related to this PR.

/override ci/prow/e2e-functests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[akrejcir]

/test ci/prow/e2e-functests

[kubevirt-bot]

@akrejcir: No presubmit jobs available for kubevirt/vm-console-proxy@main

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-functests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@akrejcir: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

• /test e2e-functests
• /test images
• /test unittests

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-functests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[akrejcir]

/approve

[kubevirt-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: akrejcir

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [akrejcir]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[akrejcir]

/cc @0xFelix @lyarwood

[0xFelix]

Can you put the changes into two separate commits please?

[lyarwood]

/lgtm