Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Implement support for browser requests. #578

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

kinyoklion
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
import {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For now I am not adding tests for this. Running the tests in node would require using an event source polyfill, effectively means it won't be testing much reality.

As a result it is likely some things will need to be tweaked when it is used for real.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have done some manual testing in a browser.

Base automatically changed from rlamb/sc-254415/support-event-source-capabilities to main September 11, 2024 16:07
An error occurred while trying to automatically change base from rlamb/sc-254415/support-event-source-capabilities to main September 11, 2024 16:07
@kinyoklion kinyoklion marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 22:11
@kinyoklion kinyoklion requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2024 22:11
@kinyoklion kinyoklion merged commit 887548a into main Sep 12, 2024
21 checks passed
@kinyoklion kinyoklion deleted the rlamb/sc-254415/implement-browser-requests branch September 12, 2024 15:40
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2024
kinyoklion pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>js-client-sdk: 0.0.1</summary>

## 0.0.1 (2024-10-10)


### Features

* Add basic secure mode support for browser SDK.
([#598](#598))
([3389983](3389983))
* Add bootstrap support.
([#600](#600))
([4e5dbee](4e5dbee))
* Add browser info.
([#576](#576))
([a2f4398](a2f4398))
* Add ESM support for common and common-client (rollup)
([#604](#604))
([8cd0cdc](8cd0cdc))
* Add support for browser contract tests.
([#582](#582))
([38f081e](38f081e))
* Add support for hooks.
([#605](#605))
([04d347b](04d347b))
* Add support for js-client-sdk style initialization.
([53f5bb8](53f5bb8))
* Add support for localStorage for the browser platform.
([#566](#566))
([4792391](4792391))
* Add URLs for custom events and URL filtering.
([#587](#587))
([7131e69](7131e69))
* Add visibility handling to allow proactive event flushing.
([#607](#607))
([819a311](819a311))
* adds datasource status to sdk-client
([#590](#590))
([6f26204](6f26204))
* Adds support for REPORT.
([#575](#575))
([916b724](916b724))
* Browser-SDK Automatically start streaming based on event handlers.
([#592](#592))
([f2e5cbf](f2e5cbf))
* Implement browser crypto and encoding.
([#574](#574))
([e763e5d](e763e5d))
* Implement goals for client-side SDKs.
([#585](#585))
([fd38a8f](fd38a8f))
* Implement support for browser requests.
([#578](#578))
([887548a](887548a))
* Refactor data source connection handling.
([53f5bb8](53f5bb8))
* Scaffold browser client.
([#579](#579))
([0848ab7](0848ab7))


### Bug Fixes

* Ensure browser contract tests run during top-level build.
([#589](#589))
([7dfb14d](7dfb14d))
* Ensure client logger is always wrapped in a safe logger.
([#599](#599))
([980e4da](980e4da))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants