Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add milestones to roadmap #3092

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

chore: add milestones to roadmap #3092

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

p-shahi
Copy link
Member

@p-shahi p-shahi commented Nov 7, 2022

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@BigLep BigLep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally seems fine to me, although I'd be in favor of reducing the number of open PRs we have on the roadmap doc. Feel free to commit to #3091

Also, the only other downside I see here is duplicating the target completion dates in multiple places.

Comment on lines +49 to +71
#### Sometime Q1
- [🛣️ Milestones](#️-milestones)
- [2022](#2022)
- [Mid Q4 (November)](#mid-q4-november)
- [Mid/End of Q4](#midend-of-q4)
- [2023](#2023)
- [Sometime Q1](#sometime-q1)
- [End of Q1 (March)](#end-of-q1-march)
- [Sometime Q2](#sometime-q2)
- [Up Next](#up-next)
- [Appendix](#appendix)
- [Experimental QUIC support](#experimental-quic-support)
- [WebRTC support (browser-to-server)](#webrtc-support-browser-to-server)
- [Cross Behaviour communication](#cross-behaviour-communication)
- [Generic connection management](#generic-connection-management)
- [Kademlia efficient querying](#kademlia-efficient-querying)
- [Kademlia client mode](#kademlia-client-mode)
- [Optimize Hole punching](#optimize-hole-punching)
- [Streaming response protocol aka. the ultimate escape hatch](#streaming-response-protocol-aka-the-ultimate-escape-hatch)
- [Improved Wasm support](#improved-wasm-support)
- [Handshake optimizations](#handshake-optimizations)
- [Bitswap implementation](#bitswap-implementation)
- [WebTransport](#webtransport)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems duplicative of the above.

@p-shahi
Copy link
Member Author

p-shahi commented Nov 7, 2022

Generally seems fine to me, although I'd be in favor of reducing the number of open PRs we have on the roadmap doc. Feel free to commit to #3091

Sounds good

@p-shahi p-shahi closed this Nov 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants