-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add a section about a new muxer to the README #395
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
||
**What?** A stream multiplexer that supports: | ||
- backpressure on the stream level (stream flow control) | ||
- backpressure on the connection level connection flow control) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- backpressure on the connection level connection flow control) | |
- backpressure on the connection level (connection flow control) |
- backpressure on the connection level connection flow control) | |
- backpressure on the connection level connection flow control) |
**Why?** So far, we've been using yamux and mplex as stream multiplexers. | ||
Shortcomings in those protocols have made our stack less robust than it | ||
could be. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about linking #394 here?
**Why?** So far, we've been using yamux and mplex as stream multiplexers. | ||
Shortcomings in those protocols have made our stack less robust than it | ||
could be. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about linking #394 here?
@@ -222,6 +222,17 @@ model. | |||
|
|||
This is the stuff pushing the existing libp2p stack forward. | |||
|
|||
### A robust stream multiplexer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest moving this below "Low latency, efficient connection handshake". What do you think?
@@ -222,6 +222,17 @@ model. | |||
|
|||
This is the stuff pushing the existing libp2p stack forward. | |||
|
|||
### A robust stream multiplexer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest moving this below "Low latency, efficient connection handshake". What do you think?
No description provided.