Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(tests): add passing test for issue 300 #301

Merged

Conversation

Goldziher
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds a passing test for issue #300, which demonstrates it cannot be reproduced.

@Goldziher Goldziher linked an issue Jul 12, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
4 tasks
@Goldziher Goldziher force-pushed the 300-bug-lists-in-union-types-are-broken-for-pydantic-models branch from 7a5059b to 7998894 Compare July 12, 2023 18:32
@Goldziher Goldziher merged commit f54f9f3 into main Jul 12, 2023
12 checks passed
@Goldziher Goldziher deleted the 300-bug-lists-in-union-types-are-broken-for-pydantic-models branch July 12, 2023 18:34
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 12, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: Lists in union types are broken for pydantic models
2 participants