Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[clang-format] improve distinction of K&R function definitions vs att…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…ributes

After
9da70ab
we saw a few regressions around trailing attribute definitions and in
typedefs (examples in the added test cases). There's some tension
distinguishing K&R definitions from attributes at the parser level,
where we have to decide if we need to put the type of the K&R definition
on a new unwrapped line before we have access to the rest of the line,
so we're scanning backwards and looking for a pattern like f(a, b). But
this type of pattern could also be an attribute macro, or the whole
declaration could be a typedef itself. I updated the code to check for a
typedef at the beginning of the line and to not consider raw identifiers
as possible first K&R declaration (but treated as an attribute macro
instead). This is not 100% correct heuristic, but I think it should be
reasonably good in practice, where we'll:
  * likely be in some very C-ish code when using K&R style (e.g., stuff
    that uses `struct name a;` instead of `name a;`
  * likely be in some very C++-ish code when using attributes
  * unlikely mix up the two in the same declaration.

Ideally, we should only decide to add the unwrapped line before the K&R
declaration after we've scanned the rest of the line an noticed the
variable declarations and the semicolon, but the way the parser is
organized I don't see a good way to do this in the current parser, which
only has good context for the previously visited tokens. I also tried
not emitting an unwrapped line there and trying to resolve the situation
later in the token annotator and the continuation indenter, and that
approach seems promising, but I couldn't make it to work without
messing up a bunch of other cases in unit tests.

Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107950
  • Loading branch information
krasimirgg committed Aug 12, 2021
1 parent 6c14688 commit 4593492
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 17 additions and 4 deletions.
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@

#include "UnwrappedLineParser.h"
#include "FormatToken.h"
#include "clang/Basic/TokenKinds.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1007,7 +1008,7 @@ static bool isC78ParameterDecl(const FormatToken *Tok) {

if (!Tok->isOneOf(tok::kw_int, tok::kw_char, tok::kw_float, tok::kw_double,
tok::kw_struct, tok::kw_union, tok::kw_long, tok::kw_short,
tok::kw_unsigned, tok::kw_register, tok::identifier))
tok::kw_unsigned, tok::kw_register))
return false;

Tok = Tok->Previous;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1378,7 +1379,8 @@ void UnwrappedLineParser::parseStructuralElement(bool IsTopLevel) {
break;
if (Previous->Previous && Previous->Previous->is(tok::at))
break;
if (isC78ParameterDecl(FormatTok)) {
if (!Line->Tokens.begin()->Tok->is(tok::kw_typedef) &&
isC78ParameterDecl(FormatTok)) {
addUnwrappedLine();
return;
}
Expand Down
15 changes: 13 additions & 2 deletions clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8247,14 +8247,25 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, ReturnTypeBreakingStyle) {
" return a + b < c;\n"
"};",
Style);
// The return breaking style doesn't affect object definitions with
// attribute-like macros.

// The return breaking style doesn't affect:
// * function and object definitions with attribute-like macros
verifyFormat("Tttttttttttttttttttttttt ppppppppppppppp\n"
" ABSL_GUARDED_BY(mutex) = {};",
getGoogleStyleWithColumns(40));
verifyFormat("Tttttttttttttttttttttttt ppppppppppppppp\n"
" ABSL_GUARDED_BY(mutex); // comment",
getGoogleStyleWithColumns(40));
verifyFormat("Tttttttttttttttttttttttt ppppppppppppppp\n"
" ABSL_GUARDED_BY(mutex1)\n"
" ABSL_GUARDED_BY(mutex2);",
getGoogleStyleWithColumns(40));
verifyFormat("Tttttt f(int a, int b)\n"
" ABSL_GUARDED_BY(mutex1)\n"
" ABSL_GUARDED_BY(mutex2);",
getGoogleStyleWithColumns(40));
// * typedefs
verifyFormat("typedef ATTR(X) char x;", getGoogleStyle());

Style = getGNUStyle();

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 4593492

Please sign in to comment.