Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FR]: Search in lists of actions #449

Open
sakkamade opened this issue Jul 1, 2021 · 8 comments
Open

[FR]: Search in lists of actions #449

sakkamade opened this issue Jul 1, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
Type-Enhancement This is request for brand new feature.

Comments

@sakkamade
Copy link
Contributor

sakkamade commented Jul 1, 2021

Brief description of the feature request.

Presently, it is awfully arduous to find a certain function in either Keyboard shortcuts and Available actions of Toolbars lists.
It would be of great help if it had some search field.

@sakkamade sakkamade added the Type-Enhancement This is request for brand new feature. label Jul 1, 2021
@sakkamade

This comment has been minimized.

@sakkamade sakkamade changed the title [FR]: Alphabet sorting in lists of actions [FR]: Sorting in lists of actions Jul 1, 2021
@sakkamade
Copy link
Contributor Author

Never mind alphabetical order, it is in alphabetical order...
I better get some sleep.

@martinrotter
Copy link
Owner

Actions in "keyboard shortcuts" are already sorted:
image

Actions in toolbar editors "available actions" are already sorted:
image

@sakkamade sakkamade changed the title [FR]: Sorting in lists of actions [FR]: Search in lists of actions Jul 1, 2021
@martinrotter
Copy link
Owner

As for some "categorization" - yes, this is somewhere quite deep on my internal TODO list.

@sakkamade
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actions in "keyboard shortcuts" are already sorted:

Yeah: #449 (comment) ...

@sakkamade
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have slightly revised the request. Sorry, again... 😢

@sakkamade
Copy link
Contributor Author

sakkamade commented Jul 1, 2021

As for some "categorization" - yes, this is somewhere quite deep on my internal TODO list.

Great, but now I wonder if it will be consistent with search.
So it would be better to choose only one of them (search or categories).

Here is how the search looks in Akregator:

akregator filters

@sakkamade
Copy link
Contributor Author

sakkamade commented Jul 1, 2021

So I see few solutions:

  1. The categories
    1. The same list, but with separators
       ----------------------------------------------------
      | ---Feed list-------------------------------------- |
      | Action A                                           |
      | Action B                                           |
      | Action C                                           |
      | ---Articles list---------------------------------- |
      | A                                                  |
      | B                                                  |
      | C                                                  |
       ----------------------------------------------------
      
      (^this is how I thought it was but without separators, thence was confused)
    2. Drop down at the top with lists categories
       ----------------------------------------------------
      | Feeds list                                      🔽 |
       ----------------------------------------------------
       ----------------------------------------------------
      | Action A                                           |
      | Action B                                           |
      | Action C                                           |
       ----------------------------------------------------
      
  2. The search field [FR]: Search in lists of actions #449 (comment)

EDIT: So far as my experience goes, the search field is always preferable to categories, if actions are plentiful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type-Enhancement This is request for brand new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants