Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Ethereum block tag para-test #1831

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 13, 2022
Merged

Add Ethereum block tag para-test #1831

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 13, 2022

Conversation

tgmichel
Copy link
Contributor

What does it do?

Add para-test to verify proper support for ethereum block tags. Includes a - currently skipped - test for tags introduced in the Merge that we will be including in 0.9.29.

What important points reviewers should know?

Is there something left for follow-up PRs?

What alternative implementations were considered?

Are there relevant PRs or issues in other repositories (Substrate, Polkadot, Frontier, Cumulus)?

What value does it bring to the blockchain users?

@tgmichel tgmichel added A0-pleasereview Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes D3-trivial PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit labels Sep 23, 2022
@tgmichel tgmichel marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2022 12:36
@tgmichel tgmichel mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2022
13 tasks
@tgmichel tgmichel merged commit 580a3ef into master Dec 13, 2022
@tgmichel tgmichel deleted the tgm-block-tag-para-test branch December 13, 2022 15:52
imstar15 pushed a commit to AvaProtocol/moonbeam that referenced this pull request May 16, 2023
* Add Ethereum block tag para-test

* unskip
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A0-pleasereview Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes D3-trivial PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants