Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #785, Clean commented out code #786

Merged

Conversation

skliper
Copy link
Contributor

@skliper skliper commented Feb 9, 2021

Describe the contribution
Fix #785 - cleans commented out code (all from test code)

Testing performed
Build/execute unit test, passes

Expected behavior changes
None, just avoids static analysis warnings

System(s) tested on

  • Hardware: [e.g. PC, SP0, MCP750]
  • OS: [e.g. Ubuntu 18.04, RTEMS 4.11, VxWorks 6.9]
  • Versions: [e.g. cFE 6.6, OSAL 4.2, PSP 1.3 for mcp750, any related apps or tools]

Additional context
Would really benefit from ASSERT macro in cFE... maybe consider moving/consolidating these general macros? Almost all the debug code that was commented out would be better replaced by ASSERT.

Third party code
None

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC

@skliper skliper added the unit-test Tickets related to the OSAL unit testing (functional and/or coverage) label Feb 9, 2021
@skliper skliper added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Feb 9, 2021
@astrogeco astrogeco changed the base branch from main to integration-candidate February 12, 2021 20:32
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit e964f1e into nasa:integration-candidate Feb 12, 2021
@skliper skliper deleted the fix785-rm_commented_out_code branch April 1, 2021 20:07
jphickey pushed a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
…chain

Fix nasa#785, update vxworks 6.9 example toolchain
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CCB:FastTrack unit-test Tickets related to the OSAL unit testing (functional and/or coverage)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove commented out code where it doesn't have a benefit
4 participants