Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: refactor test-dgram-exclusive-implicit-bind.js #10066

Conversation

cesarhq
Copy link
Contributor

@cesarhq cesarhq commented Dec 1, 2016

Checklist
  • make -j8 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test nosign (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
Affected core subsystem(s)
  • test
Description of change
    * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 1, 2016
Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM. The commit message is too long though.

@julianduque julianduque added code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP. labels Dec 1, 2016
        * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()
@cesarhq cesarhq force-pushed the cleanup-test-dgram-exclusive-implicit-bind branch from 032165d to 7493746 Compare December 1, 2016 20:11
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented Dec 2, 2016

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented Dec 4, 2016

Landed in 4601d5a, thanks for the contribution!

@addaleax addaleax closed this Dec 4, 2016
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2016
 * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()

PR-URL: #10066
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2016
 * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()

PR-URL: #10066
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2016
2 tasks
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
 * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()

PR-URL: nodejs#10066
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
jmdarling pushed a commit to jmdarling/node that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
 * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()

PR-URL: nodejs#10066
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2016
 * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()

PR-URL: #10066
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2016
 * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()

PR-URL: #10066
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2016
 * assert.equal() -> assert.strictEqual()

PR-URL: #10066
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
This was referenced Dec 21, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants