Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add URL.format() example #18888

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

doc: add URL.format() example #18888

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

zeke
Copy link
Contributor

@zeke zeke commented Feb 20, 2018

This PR adds an example use of the URL.format() method.

Resolves #18887

Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
  • doc
  • url

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. url Issues and PRs related to the legacy built-in url module. labels Feb 20, 2018
@zeke zeke changed the title docs: add URL.format() example doc: add URL.format() example Feb 20, 2018
doc/api/url.md Outdated
Example:

```js
const URL = require('url');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although it appears in other examples in this doc, I think in general we tend to leave out the require() for the module. I'm fine either way.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh! But we do use url and reserve URL for the newer url.URL. So maybe remove it and use url rather than URL below.

Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with @Trott’s suggestion, in particular because URL is now available with that name on the global object :)

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Feb 20, 2018

LGTM once we get the URL/url stuff sorted out.

@zeke
Copy link
Contributor Author

zeke commented Feb 20, 2018

Took out the require and changed URL to url to avoid new API / old API confusion. Thanks for the quick feedback!

doc/api/url.md Outdated
@@ -948,6 +948,22 @@ changes:
The `url.format()` method returns a formatted URL string derived from
`urlObject`.

Example:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: You can remove Example: too. It's obvious that it is an example.

Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I think it would be good to switch to "Prints".

}
});

// => 'https://example.com/some/path?page=1&format=json'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other places in the file use Prints or just show the output below. I personally think a "Prints" would be better than =>.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did a search in the docs and found several instances of // => symbolizing a returned value. Also, this method doesn't actually print a value, it just returns it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@zeke zeke Feb 21, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would be open to just doing // https://.... That was another "convention" I found when looking at existing code examples in Node's docs.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this case I only spoke about this specific document. And yes, // => is still used some times but it is not really common as far as I know.

So I personally would say using // 'https:... would be good.

doc/api/url.md Outdated
```js
url.format({
protocol: 'https',
hostname: `example.com`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are the backticks intended? If so, are not they a bit confusing here? With them, a template literal/a tag function/other quotes inside are usually expected.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, @vsemozhetbyt. Backticks were not intentional there. Fixed.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 2, 2018
@tniessen tniessen removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 4, 2018
@tniessen
Copy link
Member

tniessen commented Mar 4, 2018

@tniessen tniessen added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 4, 2018
@apapirovski
Copy link
Member

Landed in 1572a5b

@apapirovski apapirovski closed this Mar 4, 2018
apapirovski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2018
PR-URL: #18888
Fixes: #18887
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
@zeke zeke deleted the add-url-format-example-to-docs branch March 4, 2018 20:29
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#18888
Fixes: nodejs#18887
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Mar 6, 2018
MayaLekova pushed a commit to MayaLekova/node that referenced this pull request May 8, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#18888
Fixes: nodejs#18887
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
jasnell pushed a commit to jasnell/node that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#18888
Fixes: nodejs#18887
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2018
Backport-PR-URL: #22380
PR-URL: #18888
Fixes: #18887
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. url Issues and PRs related to the legacy built-in url module.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.