Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: skip fs-copyfile-respect-permission if root #27378

Closed

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Apr 24, 2019

Currently, if this test is run as the root user the following
failure will occur:

=== release test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions ===
Path: parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions
assert.js:89
  throw new AssertionError(obj);
  ^
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception (check).
    at Object.<anonymous>
      (/node/test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js:38:10)
    at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:759:30)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:770:10)
    at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:628:32)
    at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:555:12)
    at Function.Module.runMain (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:826:10)
    at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:11
Command:
out/Release/node test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
[05:41|% 100|+ 2620|-   1]: Done

This commit adds a root user check and skips this test if running as the
user root.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

Currently, if this test is run as the root user the following
failure will occur:

=== release test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions ===
Path: parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions
assert.js:89
  throw new AssertionError(obj);
  ^
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception (check).
    at Object.<anonymous>
      (/node/test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js:38:10)
    at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:759:30)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:770:10)
    at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:628:32)
    at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:555:12)
    at Function.Module.runMain (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:826:10)
    at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:11
Command:
out/Release/node test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
[05:41|% 100|+ 2620|-   1]: Done

This commit adds a root user check and skips this test if running as the
user root.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Apr 24, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@danbev danbev added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Apr 24, 2019
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Apr 29, 2019

Landed in 2743645.

@danbev danbev closed this Apr 29, 2019
@danbev danbev deleted the test-fs-copy-respect-permissions-root branch April 29, 2019 03:41
danbev added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2019
Currently, if this test is run as the root user the following
failure will occur:

=== release test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions ===
Path: parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions
assert.js:89
  throw new AssertionError(obj);
  ^
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception (check).
    at Object.<anonymous>
      (/node/test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js:38:10)
    at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:759:30)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:770:10)
    at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:628:32)
    at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:555:12)
    at Function.Module.runMain (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:826:10)
    at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:11
Command:
out/Release/node test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
[05:41|% 100|+ 2620|-   1]: Done

This commit adds a root user check and skips this test if running as the
user root.

PR-URL: #27378
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <zyszys98@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2019
Currently, if this test is run as the root user the following
failure will occur:

=== release test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions ===
Path: parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions
assert.js:89
  throw new AssertionError(obj);
  ^
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception (check).
    at Object.<anonymous>
      (/node/test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js:38:10)
    at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:759:30)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:770:10)
    at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:628:32)
    at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:555:12)
    at Function.Module.runMain (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:826:10)
    at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:11
Command:
out/Release/node test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
[05:41|% 100|+ 2620|-   1]: Done

This commit adds a root user check and skips this test if running as the
user root.

PR-URL: #27378
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <zyszys98@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request May 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants