-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new bone length from to DOSDP pattern template #75
Open
rays22
wants to merge
25
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
issue73
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3acbac9
Add new bone length from to DOSDP pattern template
rays22 66185aa
Fix multi_clause syntax in pattern template
rays22 8d97a2a
Add multiple subClassOf axioms
rays22 7e6c4cf
Add missing fovt var
rays22 113703e
Fix text definition
rays22 5877961
Add an xref on the definition
rays22 b8211e9
adding my edits
meghalithic 82eb444
Update bone_length_from_to.yaml
meghalithic 956219c
Update bone_length_from_to.yaml
meghalithic d7b3b93
Merge branch 'master' into issue73
rays22 ad9d851
Implement data_lis_vars
rays22 06e82cf
Update bone_length_from_to.yaml
meghalithic 1560a76
Add comment field to template
rays22 fbfbc71
Merge branch 'issue73' of github.com:obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontol…
rays22 2e912b9
Fix xref annotation
rays22 2d61e2c
Delete redundant vars and axioms
rays22 8e9ab15
fixing pattern
meghalithic ea7f682
Update dosdp patterns file
599e0a1
getting rid of unneeded syn
meghalithic 57fadc6
Merge branch 'master' into issue73
matentzn 55481cb
Update length_from_to.yaml
meghalithic 4869992
Update length_from_to.yaml
meghalithic fc03cf1
Merge branch 'master' into issue73
rays22 fef5f75
Merge branch 'master' into issue73
rays22 e3dc2fe
Update pattern templates
rays22 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
fixing pattern
- Loading branch information
commit 8e9ab15596fe93384b1d17bd70f1614c97b643d8
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It turns out that
BFO:0000050 part of
is actually not reflexive. You can check it by openingro.owl
in Protege and checking the Characteristics' pane in the 'Object Properties' tab.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we use "characteristic of part of"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"characteristic of part of" would cover the whole and all parts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, so what should I use for just part of it if that part of the bone (e.g., distal side of a talus) isn't in the ontology?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For that case the solution here is ok! But you may have to create a pattern for "side" of "anatomy" if non exists. But for the case you just want to express: some part of the thalamus (distal side or otherwise), the solution we already have is sufficient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it would have to be:
Or some such. i don't know whether part of is the correct relationship. To determine this you will have to ask in Uberon slack. Basically just "can i use
part of
to connect an anatomical entity to a region like 'distal side'?"There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
based on how distal epiphyses are defined, it'd be: length and characteristic of some (in distal side some calcaneus)
do I ask UBERON or OBA?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
definitely OBA!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will add to the agenda to discuss. I am struggling to explain over chat.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I misunderstood your question. Uberon. You need to make an issue on Uberon tracker asking for the term:
Linking to this issue here, and asking for advice on how to logically define it. You can say that the issue has emerged because @cmungall does not like the complex composition in OBA (not sure I share his views here, but lets roll with it).
What should happen: someone saying: you can define
in distal side some calcaneus
using XYZ logical definition, then creating a dosdp pattern for it. You can then just add a row in the table for each such term you need. Ping me if you get grieve from @dosumis or @shawntanzk about the request (term proliferation argument).