Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ZFA and Uberon mappings often differ on relationship type #175

Open
cmungall opened this issue Feb 1, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

ZFA and Uberon mappings often differ on relationship type #175

cmungall opened this issue Feb 1, 2013 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mellybelly
Labels
composite

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Member

cmungall commented Feb 1, 2013

following are cases where uberon uses a different relation from ZFA. Note that neither is definitely right nor wrong. Nor is it the case that the relations must match. However, for each substitution type a general pattern should be documented. Explicitly allowed differences can be added as notes on the relationship in Uberon.

develops_from->has_developmental_contribution_from

develops_from->part_of

part_of->channels_from

part_of->connects

part_of->continuous_with

part_of->develops_from

part_of->located_in

part_of->overlaps

part_of->subclass

part_of->supplies

part_of->surrounds

subclass->develops_from

subclass->develops_into

subclass->part_of
@ghost ghost assigned mellybelly Feb 1, 2013
@cmungall cmungall mentioned this issue Oct 25, 2017
Closed
@cmungall cmungall changed the title Align ZFA and Uberon ZFA and Uberon mappings often differ on relationship type Jul 26, 2021
@cmungall
Copy link
Member Author

This is an important ticket for thinking about future composite merge strategies

@anitacaron anitacaron mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mellybelly mellybelly

Labels
composite
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@cmungall @mellybelly @anitacaron