Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QCheck revdeps fixes - take 2 #24737

Merged
merged 38 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jmid
Copy link
Contributor

@jmid jmid commented Nov 2, 2023

This PR fixes a next batch of missing qcheck lower bounds spotted in #24703

@jmid jmid marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2023 17:31
@jmid
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmid commented Nov 5, 2023

I've added another batch of fixes and I'm starting to run out of steam...
Because of additional missing lower bounds, this is no longer about qcheck revdeps - but revdeps of (patched) revdeps 😬

@jmid jmid mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2023
@jmid
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmid commented Nov 6, 2023

  • A ton of revdeps of revdeps failures remain.
  • A bunch of tests fail on 32-bit platforms (arm32 and x86-32)
    • bencode.2.0
    • containers-data.3.0, containers-thread.3.0, containers.3.0
    • iter.1.2.1
    • fadbadml.0.1.2
    • minisat.0.6
    • oseq.0.4.1, oseq.0.5
    • sqlite3_utils.0.4, sqlite3_utils.0.5
  • some ppc64 failures
  • a single s390x failure (containers-thread.3.7)
  • some FreeBSD failures caused by missing g++
  • some macOS homebrew failures

None of these are caused by adding these missing lower bounds.

@mseri
Copy link
Member

mseri commented Nov 6, 2023

I suggest we fix whatever remaining failure when the chance comes. This PR is already large enough and each re0run takes lots of resources.

Thanks!

@mseri mseri merged commit 03e4c97 into ocaml:master Nov 6, 2023
1 check failed
@jmid jmid deleted the qcheck-revdeps-fixes-take2 branch November 6, 2023 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants