-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
propose experimental folder #632
propose experimental folder #632
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not clear what will be the normative status of documents here. Are they still going to contain RFC 2119 keywords (SHOULD/MUST/etc)? If so, that would be the interpretation? E.g. "SDKs that opt-in to implement experimental feature X .... SHOULD/MUST ..."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also stress that experimental features are subject to change and not suitable for use in production?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM assuming the typo will be fixed.
Co-authored-by: Armin Ruech <armin.ruech@dynatrace.com>
Co-authored-by: Armin Ruech <armin.ruech@dynatrace.com>
Co-authored-by: Reiley Yang <reyang@microsoft.com>
discussed with @open-telemetry/technical-committee that experimental folder may expedite development of OpenTelemetry features. The first feature discussed is a zPages