feat: Add bun documentation to README.md #918
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the contribution! We ❤️ bun, but its installation is intuitive to any bun user, and not worth the extra installation instruction. |
|
Sad |
|
Plenty of projects list support for a combination of npm/Bun/Deno. Here, Bun is punished for being more "intuitive" to use? Feels like an unrigorous way to establish inclusion. Please reconsider, not to mention that adding Bun docs could be a great way to get exposure for your package. |
|
came here for the team reunion |
|
hope everyone is doin good |
|
Hah. Hey guys, good to see you! Luke, missed that was you – great avatar. I'll float this with the team… |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes being requested
README.Additional context & links
I noticed that the readme had install instructions for npm and Deno. I figured it would be helpful to have Bun as well.
I understand that there may be some hesitation to add another download method, but Bun has more monthly installations than Deno, so if there's only room for one other non-npm option, it might make sense to keep Bun and drop Deno.