USHIFT No-Issue: storage config fixes

[copejon]

• .storage.with-csi-components --> .storage.optionalCsiComponents
• .storage.optionalCsiComponents added none value to supported inputs

[openshift-ci-robot]

@copejon: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

• .storage.with-csi-components --> .storage.optionalCsiComponents
• .storage.optionalCsiComponents added none value to supported inputs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[pmtk]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

@copejon: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[copejon]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: copejon
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign derekwaynecarr for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-bot]

Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale proposals rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

[copejon]

/remove-lifecycle stale

[copejon]

/cc @jerpeter1 I think I need your approve on this?

[openshift-bot]

Inactive enhancement proposals go stale after 28d of inactivity.

See https://github.com/openshift/enhancements#life-cycle for details.

Mark the proposal as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale proposals rot after an additional 7d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this proposal from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this proposal is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale