Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update documentation for functions #8353

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

PaddyMc
Copy link
Contributor

@PaddyMc PaddyMc commented Jun 5, 2024

What is the purpose of the change

Update documentation for functions based on audit feedback

@PaddyMc PaddyMc added V:state/compatible/backport State machine compatible PR, should be backported A:no-changelog A:backport/v25.x backport patches to v25.x branch labels Jun 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on refining the x/smart-account package by adjusting how authenticator data is referenced and documented. Specifically, the GetInitializedAuthenticatorForAccount function now uses GetSelectedAuthenticatorData instead of GetAuthenticatorDataForAccount. Additionally, a comment about allowing users to pass no data if the public key is already in the auth store has been removed from the OnAuthenticatorAdded method in the SignatureVerification struct.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
x/smart-account/authenticator/signature_authenticator.go Removed the comment about allowing users to pass no data if the public key is already in the auth store.
x/smart-account/keeper/keeper.go GetInitializedAuthenticatorForAccount function now references GetSelectedAuthenticatorData instead of GetAuthenticatorDataForAccount.

Poem

In the realm of code so smart,
Authenticator's had a change of heart.
No more comments left to see,
Public keys set users free.
With selected data, keepers stand,
A smarter account across the land.


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60dd767 and e359aef.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/smart-account/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • x/smart-account/keeper/keeper.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/smart-account/authenticator/signature_authenticator.go (1)

Line range hint 82-82: Consider re-adding or improving the documentation for OnAuthenticatorAdded.

The removed comment provided clarity on the method's behavior when no data is passed. It's important for maintainability and understanding to have clear documentation, especially for public methods.

@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ func (k Keeper) GetSelectedAuthenticatorData(
}

// GetInitializedAuthenticatorForAccount returns a single authenticator for the account
// this function relies in GetAuthenticatorDataForAccount, this function calls
// this function relies in GetSelectedAuthenticatorData, this function calls
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still typo, "this function relies in X," doesn't make sense. I'm also not sure if the top line is supposed to continue on to the second line or if its a new sentence.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@PaddyMc PaddyMc Jun 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review:

Updated to be:

// GetInitializedAuthenticatorForAccount returns a single initialized authenticator for the account.
// It fetches the authenticator data from the store, gets the authenticator struct from the manager, then calls initialize on the authenticator data

@PaddyMc PaddyMc closed this Jun 11, 2024
@PaddyMc PaddyMc reopened this Jun 11, 2024
@PaddyMc PaddyMc closed this Jun 11, 2024
@PaddyMc PaddyMc reopened this Jun 11, 2024
@czarcas7ic czarcas7ic merged commit a716aac into main Jun 12, 2024
1 check passed
@czarcas7ic czarcas7ic deleted the chore/update-documentation-for-functions branch June 12, 2024 17:36
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
* chore: update documentation for functions

* chore: update comment to make more sense

* chore: update comment again

* chore: fix spelling

(cherry picked from commit a716aac)

# Conflicts:
#	x/smart-account/keeper/keeper.go
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A:backport/v25.x backport patches to v25.x branch A:no-changelog V:state/compatible/backport State machine compatible PR, should be backported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants