[stm32] fix adc #822
Merged
[stm32] fix adc #822
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
very hack-ish fix for when using multiple ADs, e.g. AD1 and AD2 Before this "fix" e.g. AD1_1 and AD2_1 had the same value (0). Can probably be done more nicely...
flixr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2014
[stm32] fix adc very hack-ish fix for when using multiple ADs, e.g. AD1 and AD2 Before this "fix" e.g. AD1_1 and AD2_1 had the same value (0).
flixr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2014
- very hack-ish fix for when using multiple ADs, e.g. AD1 and AD2 Before this "fix" e.g. AD1_1 and AD2_1 had the same value (0). - NB_ADC only needed for lpc21 - test_adc: send all raw ADC values backport of #822
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
very hack-ish fix for when using multiple ADs, e.g. AD1 and AD2
Before this "fix" e.g. AD1_1 and AD2_1 had the same value (0).
Can probably be done more nicely...