Fix off by one error in parachain display

[atomaka]

A word of caution: I don't know enough about the table display library to know if this is the right fix, but I'd rather submit a pull request than an issue!

I'm experiencing an off-by-one error in the display output for parachain information. Running a basic config (truncated for brevity, full config file at https://gist.github.com/atomaka/1696faaec51e74878037837914e8c2d3):

provider = "native"

[relaychain]
  [[relaychain.nodes]]
  name = "alice"

  [[relaychain.nodes]]
  name = "bob"

[[parachains]]
id = 2114

  [parachains.collator]
  name = "collator2114"

[[parachains]]
id = 1999

  [parachains.collator]
  name = "collator1999"

My parachain information gets displayed incorrectly. The network information for parachain 1999 is displayed under the second relay node (bob) and the network information for parachain 2114 is displayed under 1999. 2114 does not have the information. Example output:

This commit changes ordering in the parachain display information loop and seems to resolve the issue.

[wirednkod]

Thank you @atomaka
As far as I know, the table is not meant to show "one under the other" correlation. Is just info concerning each node.

cc @pepoviola

[atomaka]

Thank you @atomaka As far as I know, the table is not meant to show "one under the other" correlation. Is just info concerning each node.

cc @pepoviola

Maybe I didn't represent the issue clearly. The image should show it well though. The "Parachain ID" and "Chainspec Path" fields are placed under the incorrect node.

[wirednkod]

Thank you @atomaka As far as I know, the table is not meant to show "one under the other" correlation. Is just info concerning each node.

cc @pepoviola

Maybe I didn't represent the issue clearly. The image should show it well though. The "Parachain ID" and "Chainspec Path" fields are placed in the incorrect table.

Apologies. Understood the issue now. Thank you for that

[pepoviola]

Looks good @atomaka! Thanks for the fix!