Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner/cascades: introduce EngineType in physical property (experimental) #12437

Closed

Conversation

francis0407
Copy link
Member

What problem does this PR solve?

In #12257, we tried to implement selection in cascades planner. But we found that introducing EngineType in Group truly increases the complexity of the framework. So in this PR, I try to introduce EngineType in physical property.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Integration test

Code changes

  • Has exported variable/fields change

Side effects

  • Increased code complexity

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #12437 into master will decrease coverage by 0.1179%.
The diff coverage is 63.1578%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             master     #12437       +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage   79.7567%   79.6387%   -0.118%     
===============================================
  Files           462        461        -1     
  Lines        102034     101438      -596     
===============================================
- Hits          81379      80784      -595     
- Misses        14781      14832       +51     
+ Partials       5874       5822       -52

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant