Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

br: reused table id is disabled when restore a brand-new cluster #41402

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2023

Conversation

YuJuncen
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picking (Unmerged) #41358.

===

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #41333

Problem Summary:
when restoring to a brand-new cluster, reused table id was disabled, which caused restore to consume more resources.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Feb 14, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • 3pointer
  • fengou1

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 14, 2023
@fengou1 fengou1 self-requested a review February 14, 2023 09:55
@sre-bot sre-bot added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label Feb 14, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Feb 14, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Feb 14, 2023
@fengou1
Copy link
Contributor

fengou1 commented Feb 14, 2023

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: a5962af

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 14, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit e07fc7f into pingcap:release-6.6 Feb 14, 2023
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Feb 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/6.6-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants